|
|
Posted at 1:42 PM on 7/25/2011
|
|
Does anyone know if the EPA has accepted the micro motion verification as meeting the requirements of annual gas flow meter verification under 40CFG part75 appendix D?
Does anyone know if the EPA has accepted the micro motion verification as meeting the requirements of annual gas flow meter verification under 40CFG part75 appendix D?
|
|
|
Posted at 10:18 AM on 7/28/2011
|
|
Hi Alan- EPA accepts Meter Verification (MV) for part 98 (GreenHouse Gas), but to our knowledge not (yet?) for part 75. We've lobbied an EPA inspector in upstate NY on behalf of a major provider of Power turbines and have been told that they are "too busy" to consult with the folks working on part 98.
I have part 75 appendix D (part 428 to 456) on my desk, and it appears to have not been updated since ~ 2002. We released MV around 2006.
It has been suggested that we help organize a group of interested parties (users) and petititon the EPA for a revision. We would of course be most interested and make resources available to help with the writing.
Am I correct in assuming you are an end-user of Coriolis?
Please let us know your thoughts as to how we can best help
Tom
Hi Alan- EPA accepts Meter Verification (MV) for part 98 (GreenHouse Gas), but to our knowledge not (yet?) for part 75. We've lobbied an EPA inspector in upstate NY on behalf of a major provider of Power turbines and have been told that they are "too busy" to consult with the folks working on part 98.
I have part 75 appendix D (part 428 to 456) on my desk, and it appears to have not been updated since ~ 2002. We released MV around 2006.
It has been suggested that we help organize a group of interested parties (users) and petititon the EPA for a revision. We would of course be most interested and make resources available to help with the writing.
Am I correct in assuming you are an end-user of Coriolis?
Please let us know your thoughts as to how we can best help
Tom
|
|
|
Posted at 1:31 PM on 3/27/2012
|
|
Tom, Sorry for the delay, I dropped the ball. No I am not an end user. I work for an engineering firm. We specify systems for end users. The Coriolis meter just makes a tremendous amout of sense in this application. I am willing to help with this effort.
Tom, Sorry for the delay, I dropped the ball. No I am not an end user. I work for an engineering firm. We specify systems for end users. The Coriolis meter just makes a tremendous amout of sense in this application. I am willing to help with this effort.
|