|
|
Posted at 8:53 PM on 11/10/2009
|
|
If you are a current or past user of Toolkit and have any suggestions for improvement please post them on this Forum. We are currently working on these enhancements to the online product advisor tool:
o Adding product selection for Dedicated Density Instruments
o Coriolis Graphing (Accuracy and Pressure Drop over the flow range)
o Display of Ranking Details and ability to sort results based on user preferences
If you are a current or past user of Toolkit and have any suggestions for improvement please post them on this Forum. We are currently working on these enhancements to the online product advisor tool:
o Adding product selection for Dedicated Density Instruments
o Coriolis Graphing (Accuracy and Pressure Drop over the flow range)
o Display of Ranking Details and ability to sort results based on user preferences
Edited by Ted Doering, 2 year(s) ago
|
|
|
Posted at 8:59 AM on 11/17/2009
|
|
are we doing anything to improve the online sizing tool? We get a lot of customer compaints
are we doing anything to improve the online sizing tool? We get a lot of customer compaints
|
|
|
|
Posted at 7:49 AM on 11/18/2009
|
|
Yes, we are currently considering many improvements. What are the top unmet needs that you hear about?
Yes, we are currently considering many improvements. What are the top unmet needs that you hear about?
|
|
|
Posted at 11:08 AM on 11/18/2009
|
|
Online sizing tool needs to be able to size for non-Newtonian fluids.
Online sizing tool needs to be able to size for non-Newtonian fluids.
|
|
|
|
Posted at 1:08 PM on 11/18/2009
|
|
Toolkit asks for fluid pressure and temperature (min., normal and max.) but does NOT use this data for the meter accuracy calculations. This is very misleading at the least.
I would like to see the accuracy data and graphs that are presented in Toolkit include the inaccuracy due to fluid temperature and pressure effects. I have made a request that this be done. What is the status of making this change?
Toolkit asks for fluid pressure and temperature (min., normal and max.) but does NOT use this data for the meter accuracy calculations. This is very misleading at the least.
I would like to see the accuracy data and graphs that are presented in Toolkit include the inaccuracy due to fluid temperature and pressure effects. I have made a request that this be done. What is the status of making this change?
|
|
|
Posted at 7:47 AM on 11/19/2009
|
|
Jim, to whom did you make this request? I do not recall seeing it.
Jim, to whom did you make this request? I do not recall seeing it.
|
|
|
|
Posted at 7:55 AM on 11/19/2009
|
|
Jim, thank you very much for the feedback! As for non-Newtonian fluids, this will be available in a future release on the web and is currently available in Toolkit. As for the Pressure and Temperature compensated accuracies I will have to consult with Engineering to better understand the requirements. We will add this to the new feature request list. Thanks again. Ted
Jim, thank you very much for the feedback! As for non-Newtonian fluids, this will be available in a future release on the web and is currently available in Toolkit. As for the Pressure and Temperature compensated accuracies I will have to consult with Engineering to better understand the requirements. We will add this to the new feature request list. Thanks again. Ted
|
|
|
|
Posted at 6:37 AM on 12/4/2009
|
|
Linda: Jim Keaveney made these requests for me, so you may find them under his name.
Linda: Jim Keaveney made these requests for me, so you may find them under his name.
|
|
|
|
Posted at 7:00 AM on 12/4/2009
|
|
Ted: Talk with Tim Patton about effects of P&T on accuarcy. We have discused this several times. I have an Excel spreadsheet I made to calculate this, which Tim inputted to. I would be more than happy to share this with you as background.
Ted: Talk with Tim Patton about effects of P&T on accuarcy. We have discused this several times. I have an Excel spreadsheet I made to calculate this, which Tim inputted to. I would be more than happy to share this with you as background.
|
|
|
|
Posted at 12:53 PM on 12/4/2009
|
|
Jim, I will followup with Tim, if you send me the file I will take a look. ted.doering@emerson.com.
Jim, I will followup with Tim, if you send me the file I will take a look. ted.doering@emerson.com.
|
Back to Discussion Board